To improve cyber security, an adaptation of the “security island” design has been made. It includes a 4-core CPU with more than 2000 DMIPS a DSP that operates at least 2 times faster than comparable products and a proprietary RSP for fast radar signal processing.įor debugging, the Andes chips offer JTAG and Aurora interfaces multiple data channels and analysis modules.
In the areas of computing power, RF design, cascade function, debugging and cyber security, this family occupies a top position in the competitive environment. It consists of two 4T4R radar SoCs in 22nm technology to realise 4D premium and imaging radar functions. In addition, Alps-Pro’s various debugging functions, easier management of CPU resources and ASPICE compliance provide greater ease of use and shorten time-to-market.Īt the same time, the company introduced the Andes product family, the next generation of its mmWave radar. The chip received a 100 Mbit/s Ethernet interface as a result, the throughput could be increased 19-fold. The previous single-core CPU was replaced by a dual-core CPU, and the memory size was doubled. An integrated baseband accelerator (BBA) handles all radar signal processing. Examples include a more precise phase shifter higher channel-to-channel isolation larger RF link budget. A forward-looking radar based on Alp-Pro can have a maximum detection range of 240 m and offers an angular accuracy of ☐.1° and a resolution of 3°.Ĭompared to the existing Alps products, the Alps-Pro product offers significant advantages. It is a 4T4R SoC with low power consumption and the smallest die size among comparable products on the market. The production hardware and firmware is finally available for all the different remotes and since the weather cooperated, I headed back out to the ~half mile long red barn test course to see how the radar detectors compare.Alps-Pro was developed based on Alps’ mmWave radar SoC platform, but is more powerful and robust. We tested all the detectors on 33.8, 34.7, and K band. I also ran my Uniden R3 as a baseline and even brought a few other windshield mount detectors as well, but I generally had to cut them for the sake of time. Escort Max Ci 360, 1.3 (on loan from Radenso RC M (provided by Radenso.Running initial public firmware, the version isn’t listed in the settings so I’m not sure exactly what version it’s running) Net Radar DSP, ALP 5.4.5/7.6 (provided by NR).
Stinger VIP, 4.0.52UK (provided by Stinger).Uniden R3, 1.36 (my daily detector, provided by Uniden.The firmware should be publicly released soon.)Īll the detectors were set up with the standard settings. Every detector alerted right around the red barn, maybe a little before or after, and every detector gave plenty of warning (which is what I was expecting, given these are all high end radar detectors). They all generally all went off around 2300-2700 feet away. The Escort Max Ci 360 impressed me with consistently long range runs including the longest 33.8 run of the day. The Stinger VIP did much better than it did last time when it gave really poor results. This is the same hardware, firmware, settings, and everything. The Radenso RC M and Net Radar DSP did well too. The NR DSP just barely edged out the RC M. Both had two shorter 1600’ish foot detections for one of the runs (the course has several different detection “zones” due to the nature of the terrain) which kind of messed up their I are running different firmware versions of the R3, but both detectors performed similarly.
Net radar dsp alp radar plus#
His got better range overall, but the differences were within the normal bounds of sample variation, normal run-to-run variation, plus a little fudge factor due to my measurement method (V1Driver) only being accurate to +/- 50 feet or so. So yeah we were running different firmware versions, but I don’t think the differences in the detection ranges are due to the different firmware versions. He wanted to test out the impact of Ka Filtering on his R3 so we did two passes with Ka Filter On and two more with Ka Filter Off. His R3 did well with the filter on or off, but it did give slightly longer detections with the filter off. Every detector gave tons of warning on 34.7 as well. No detector turned in poor results like I’ve seen in the past with lower grade detectors. I actually brought that crappy Chinese V7 Batman detector along to run as well, mainly for comic relief, but the power cable was toast so the detector wouldn’t even power on. To simplify things, here’s a look at the average of the two runs for each detector.
0 kommentar(er)
